SC Gives Telecoms Ten Years to Pay AGR Dues

After a legal battle of twenty-one years, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court has given the final verdict on the Adjusted Gross Revenue (“AGR”) dues of the Telecom Companies (“Telecoms”). The Court had already calculated the AGR dues in October 2019 and now the Court has given a time-frame of ten years to theContinue reading “SC Gives Telecoms Ten Years to Pay AGR Dues”

The Curious Case of NLAT

The National Law Aptitude Test (“NLAT”) was an alternate entrance exam created by NLSIU to admit the 2020-25 batch of students during the COVID-19 pandemic. The contentions to NLAT are in light of the by-laws of the CLAT consortium stating that no institution of the consortium can hold an individual entrance exam while being partContinue reading “The Curious Case of NLAT”

Daughters are Entitled to have Equal Coparcenary Rights Even if Born Prior to Hindu Succession Amendment Act (2005)

In Vineeta Sharama v. Rakesh Sharma, the Supreme Court rectified its mistake in Prakash v. Phulavati, where it had held that, “the rights under the amendment are applicable to living daughters of living coparceners as on 9-09-2005 irrespective of when such daughters are born”. This precisely means that the daughters cannot ask for equal rightsContinue reading “Daughters are Entitled to have Equal Coparcenary Rights Even if Born Prior to Hindu Succession Amendment Act (2005)”

Defence of Juvenility and Unsoundness of Mind Must be Raised During Trial

A three-judge bench of Supreme Court in Mohd. Anwar v. NCT of Delhi held that “a plea of unsoundness of mind as under section 84 of the Indian Penal [C]ode along with attempts to mitigate the punishment by raising the defense of juvenility must be raised during the trial as opposed to [during] a laterContinue reading “Defence of Juvenility and Unsoundness of Mind Must be Raised During Trial”

Dalbir Singh v. NCT of Delhi

The above-named Appellant appealed the Order of the Delhi High Court rejecting the Appellant’s claim for release of compensation  under Section 357(3) of CrPC. The Respondents, members of the police force, were accused of having illegally detained and torturing the Appellant’s son in connection with a theft case. The Appellant’s son succumbed to injuries causedContinue reading “Dalbir Singh v. NCT of Delhi”

Common Cause v. Union of India

The Applicant herein, M/s Orissa Minerals Development Company Limited sought condonation of delay in the payment under the Order passed by the Court. The Applicant had also requested for a direction to the State of Orissa to conduct joint verification of the undisposed stock and allow sale of the same to enable the Applicant companyContinue reading “Common Cause v. Union of India”

Amish Devgan v. Union of India

This was a petition filed by Amish Devgan, a journalist and managing editor-in-chief of News 18, under Article 32 of the Constitution to quash FIRs arising from the same cause of action in different states. The contention is against calling Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti, a revered saint of India, as a terrorist and a robber onContinue reading “Amish Devgan v. Union of India”

Arnab Manoranjan Goswami vs the State of Maharashtra & Ors.

The foundation of this case was more political in nature than legal, but this commentary will be focusing on, and restricted to the legal aspects of it. It all started back in the year 2018, when Arnab Goswami, the owner of ARG Outlier Media, and two other accused were booked by the Alibaug Police forContinue reading “Arnab Manoranjan Goswami vs the State of Maharashtra & Ors.”

Kirit P. Mehta School of Law Publications